alamatgue.com

Jakarta, 9 Nov 2009 – Ary Muladi, a key witness in the case of the KPK leadership (disabled) Bibit S Riyanto and Chandra M Hamzah will be examined as a witness related new presumption of defamation President and bribery at Police Headquarters. Previously he had been named as a suspect for embezzlement cases, fraud, and forgery.

It was revealed Muladi Ary’s attorney, Peter Salestinus, at Police Headquarters on Monday (9 / 11). He came with several other attorneys to submit a written request to the investigator inspection delays.

“Ary will be examined as a witness in criminal conduct or attempted bribery or evil plot to corrupt or criminal defamation President and or insult to the institutions and public officials,” he explained.

Peter explained, the petition filed inspection delays experienced due to threats linked klienya revocation checking the minutes (BAP). On the threat, Ary will ask for protection from the Institute of Witnesses and Victims Protection (LPSK) this afternoon.

“There must be security guarantees from LPSK. Moreover, he gave the information as a witness. He must be in a free state so that their composition is not an objective statement now. So we asked for a postponement of the examination one week after an assurance from LPSK,” he explained.

Ari Meet Ade Raharja 6 time in the Commission Said Hendarman, Phone call for 64 Times

Ari Muladi denied met with Deputy Prosecution KPK, Ade Raharja. But the evidence says that Ari had contact Muladi precisely 64 times as much communication and conduct meetings in the Commission 6 times.

“Ari who said it was not familiar with Ade, he said only once to the Commission. But there are evidences to KPK 6 times, 64 times the phone,” said Attorney General Hendarman Supandji in the House of Representatives Commission III meeting, Attorney General of the Parliament Building, Senayan, Monday (9 / 11/2009).

Hendarman also questioned the removal of the BAP Ari information first and rectify if Ari gave money USD $ 3.75 billion to Yulianto. “Why is submitted to Yulianto? If he said do not know Ade, but the evidence says so,” he explained.

Therefore, Hendarman asked the council come together to formulate a description that is the key Ari Seed-Chandra case. “This needs to be formulated together. If it has not been proven absolutely,” he said.

Chief of Police and the Attorney General ‘cheated‘ subordinates?

A playback recording on the Constitutional Court (MK) that allegedly contains the weakening efforts Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) by the Police, AGO and judicial mafia raises the big question. How much knowledge of Police and the Attorney General of the doings of the men mentioned in this record?
“I will not say they were involved but at least they let his men do this. So the way they work is not professional,” said Chairman Tim Eight Adnan Buyung Nasution Wantimpres Office, Monday (9 / 11).
The proof, said Buyung, nothing reveals a series of National Police data dikukuhkannya through word ‘must’. Similarly, the Attorney General, he added. “Where the evidence? Are they fooled by his subordinates, or are they not understand the problem?” Members asked Wantimpres this.
However, too fast, if mentioned that National Police, and the Attorney General lied. Pitcher said many missing links in this case to do cross and check. “So not exactly sure dong as the Chief of Police and Corn. So in this case they are too early because there are facts and should be clarified and kroscek first,” he continued.
If later data searches and the fact it will lead to a recommendation should be addressed firmly by the President. If not, then the President is also to be responsible, said Buyung.